Counterinsurgency: Strategy and the Phoenix of American Capability
Authored by Dr. Steven Metz.
Other Studies by Keyword
Dr. Steven Metz argues that the way the Department of Defense and U.S. military spend the time when counterinsurgency support is not an important part of American national security strategy determines how quickly and easily they react when policymakers commit the nation to such activity. If analysis and debate continues, at least at a low level, the military is better prepared for the reconstitution of capabilities. If it ignores global developments in insurgency and counterinsurgency, the reconstitution of capabilities would be more difficult.
You may also be interested in the following titles:
Also by the Author/Editor:
2010 SSI Annual Strategy Conference Report "Defining War for the 21st Century"
Decisionmaking In Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: The Strategic Shift of 2007
Decisionmaking in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: Removing Saddam Hussein by Force
COIN of the Realm: U.S. Counterinsurgency Strategy
Learning from Iraq: Counterinsurgency in American Strategy
Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in the 21st Century: Reconceputalizing Threat and Response
View other pubs in the following categories:
Download it Now!
- Download Format: PDF
- PDF File Size: 0.10MB
- Study is: Available via Download Only
- View Cart
- All hardcopies are free of charge, shipping inclusive.
- For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, recieve many prior publications. Click here to visit.
- All materials on our website are available as a free download.