Text Browser Navigation Bar: Main Site Navigation and Search | Current Page Navigation | Current Page Content
U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> The 2006 Lebanon Campaign and the Future of Warfare: Implications for Army and Defense Policy
U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details
Authored by Dr. Stephen D. Biddle, Mr. Jeffrey A. Friedman.
Many now see future warfare as a matter of nonstate actors employing irregular methods against Western states. This expectation has given rise to a range of sweeping proposals for transforming the U.S. military to meet such threats. In this context, Hezbollah’s 2006 campaign in southern Lebanon has been receiving increasing attention as a prominent recent example of a nonstate actor fighting a Westernized state. In particular, critics of irregular-warfare transformation often cite the 2006 case as evidence that non-state actors can nevertheless wage conventional warfare in state-like ways. This monograph assesses this claim via a detailed analysis of Hezbollah’s military behavior, coupled with deductive inference from observable Hezbollah behavior in the field to findings for their larger strategic intent for the campaign.

The Challenge of Drug Trafficking to Democratic Governance and Human Security in West Africa

Sharing Power? Prospects for a U.S. Concert-Balance Strategy

Egypt's New Regime and the Future of the U.S.-Egyptian Strategic Relationship

Making Strategic Sense of Cyber Power: Why the Sky Is Not Falling

Governance, Identity, and Counterinsurgency: Evidence from Ramadi and Tal Afar
American Grand Strategy After 9/11: An Assessment
Afghanistan and the Future of Warfare: Implications for Army and Defense Policy
Era of Persistent Conflict
Middle East and North Africa
Military Strategy and Policy
Global Strategy
National Military Strategy