Appeasement Reconsidered: Investigating the Mythology of the 1930s
Authored by Dr. Jeffrey Record.
Other Studies by Keyword
U.S. use of force since 1945 has been significantly influenced by the perceived consequences of appeasing Hitler in the 1930s, and from the mid-1970s to 2001 by the chilling effect of the Vietnam War. As the United States approached its second war with Iraq, proponents cited the Munich analogy to justify the war, whereas opponents argued that the United States was risking another Vietnam. Though reasoning by historical analogies is inherently dangerous, an examination of the threat parallels between Hitler and Saddam Hussein, and between the Vietnam War and the situation the United States has confronted in post-Baathist Iraq, reveals that the Munich analogy was misused as an argument for war, whereas the American dilemma in Iraq bears some important analogies to the Vietnam conflict, especially with respect to the challenges state-building and sustaining domestic public support for an unpopular protracted war.
You may also be interested in the following titles:
Also by the Author/Editor:
Japan's Decision for War in 1941: Some Enduring Lessons
Iraq and Vietnam: Differences, Similarities, and Insights
Bounding the Global War on Terrorism
The Creeping Irrelevance of U.S. Force Planning
Ready For What and Modernized Against Whom?: A Strategic Perspective on Readiness and Modernization
View other pubs in the following category:
Download it Now!
- Download Format: PDF
- PDF File Size: 0.32MB
- Study is: Available via Download Only
- View Cart
- All hardcopies are free of charge, shipping inclusive.
- For out of stock or digital only publications, refer to the new GPO on-demand site. For a small fee, recieve many prior publications. Click here to visit.
- All materials on our website are available as a free download.