U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Law vs. War: Competing Approaches to Fighting Terrorism

Authored by Ms. Shawn Boyne, Mr. Michael German, Dr. Paul R Pillar, Dr. Dallas D. Owens.

Other Studies by Keyword

+[Boyne] +[German] +[Pillar] +[Owens] +[Europe] +[Germany] +[North Atlantic Treaty Organization] +[NATO] +[terrorism] +[Global War on Terrorism] +[torture] +[human rights] +[GWOT] +[terrorist groups] +[Red Armee Fraktion] +[Afghanistan] +[German military] +[Basic Law] +[Rule of Law] +[German Culture]

Brief Synopsis

The authors address one of the fundamental assumptions underlying the conduct of the War on Terrorism - the nature of our enemy, whether perpetrators of terrorist activities are criminals or soldiers (combatants). Although the United States recognizes that terrorist acts are certainly illegal, it has chosen to treat perpetrators as combatants; but much of the world, including many of our traditional allies, have opted for a purely legalistic approach. Disagreement about assumptions is not the only basis for divergent policies for confronting terrorism, but certainly explains much of our inability to agree on strategies to overcome what we recognize as a serious common and persistent international problem. Their insights into how our respective cultures and histories influence our definitions, assumptions, and subsequent policy decisions can assist us to respect and learn from competing strategies. They correctly surmise that our current international struggle is too important for us to ignore assumptions underlying our own and competing ideas.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for U.S. Military Strategy

• 
  Old and New Insurgency Forms

• 
  The New Arab Regional Order: Opportunities and Challenges for U.S. Policy

• 
  The Army War College Review Vol. 1 No. 3

• 
  Terrorist and Insurgent Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Use, Potentials, and Military Implications

• 
  Reassessing the Barriers to Islamic Radicalization in Kazakhstan

• 
  The Gulf Moment: Arab Relations Since 2011

• 
  Assessing Egyptian Public Support for Security Crackdowns in the Sinai

Survey: Law vs. War: Competing Approaches to Fighting Terrorism

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality? (5 best - 1 Worst)

12345

N/A

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Authors/Editor:

Drug Trafficking, Violence, and Instability in Mexico, Colombia, and the Caribbean: Implications for U.S. National Security
American Grand Strategy after War
State of the U.S. Military Reserve Components
Opportunities for Engaging Minorities
Beyond The U.S. War on Terrorism: Comparing Domestic Legal Remedies to an International Dilemma
Stabilization and Post-Conflict Operations: The Role of the Military
AC/RC Integration: Today's Success and Transformation's Challenge

View other pubs in the following category:

Era of Persistent Conflict