U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

Redefining Land Power for the 21st Century

Authored by Dr. William T. Johnsen.

Other Studies by Keyword

+[interdependence] +[force structure] +[Landpower] +[Johnsen]

Brief Synopsis

Divisive debates over the future force structures of the U.S. Armed Forces have continued despite the Report of the Commission on Roles and Missions for the Armed Forces (May 1995) and the more recent reports of the Quadrennial Defense Review (May 1997) and the National Defense Panel (December 1997). Part of the reason for the bitter nature of these debates is due to parochial partisanship. Part is due to a lack of clear understanding of the individual components of military power or of their collective interrelationships. This latter conclusion may be particularly true for land power. Responsibility for this misunderstanding does not always fall at the feet of outside observers. No official definition or general articulation of land power currently exists. And, because land power is self-evident to most who wear Army or Marine Corps green, they see little need to explain land power to a broader audience. But, if national leaders are to have a fuller under- standing of land power, its central role in the growing interdependence of military power, or the policy options that land power's versatility brings to security policy planning and execution, then such explanations are imperative. To help fill this conceptual gap, the author offers a definition of land power to meet the demands of the 21st century. While defining land power is his primary purpose, he also places land power within the overarching context of total military power. Additionally, he highlights the growing interdependence among the components of national power.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  Nigerian Unity: In the Balance

• 
  Avoiding the Slippery Slope: Conducting Effective Interventions

• 
  Cyber Infrastructure Protection: Vol. II

• 
  Sharing Power? Prospects for a U.S. Concert-Balance Strategy

• 
  Making Strategic Sense of Cyber Power: Why the Sky Is Not Falling

• 
  From Chaos to Cohesion: A Regional Approach to Security, Stability, and Development in Sub-Saharan A...

• 
  Governance, Identity, and Counterinsurgency: Evidence from Ramadi and Tal Afar

• 
  Jihadist Cells and "IED" Capabilities in Europe: Assessing the Present and Future Threat to the West

Survey: Redefining Land Power for the 21st Century

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

Also by the Author/Editor:

European Security: Washington's Shaping Strategy in Action
Force Planning Considerations for Army XXI
The Future Roles of U.S. Military Power and Their Implications
U.S. Participation in IFOR: A Marathon, not a Sprint
The Future of American Landpower: Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century Army
Deciphering the Balkan Enigma: Using History to Inform Policy
U.S. Policy in the Balkans: A Hobson's Choice
The Principles of War in the 21st Century: Strategic Considerations

View other pubs in the following categories:

21st Century Warfare
Landpower Roles