U.S. Army War College >> Strategic Studies Institute >> Publications >> Details

An Evaluation of Counterinsurgency as a Strategy for Fighting the Long War

Authored by LTC Baucum Fulk.

Brief Synopsis

Counterterrorism, support to insurgency, and antiterrorism are each both efficient and sustainable from a military and economic perspective, and each have inherent political concerns, hazards, or constraints. The author maintains that an overall strategy combining counterterrorism and antiterrorism is the best means of employing military forces to counter violent extremism.

You may also be interested in the following titles:

• 
  From Chaos to Cohesion: A Regional Approach to Security, Stability, and Development in Sub-Saharan A...

• 
  Governance, Identity, and Counterinsurgency: Evidence from Ramadi and Tal Afar

• 
  The Impact of President Felipe Calderón’s War on Drugs on the Armed Forces: The Prospects for Mexico...

• 
  Jihadist Cells and "IED" Capabilities in Europe: Assessing the Present and Future Threat to the West

• 
  State-Building Challenges in a Post-Revolution Libya

• 
  The Future of American Landpower: Does Forward Presence Still Matter? The Case of the Army in Europe

• 
  Lead Me, Follow Me, Or Get Out of My Way: Rethinking and Refining the Civil-Military Relationship

• 
  2012-13 Key Strategic Issues List

Survey: An Evaluation of Counterinsurgency as a Strategy for Fighting the Long War

1. How would you rate the writing and overall quality?

12345

2. Is the content relevant for influencing present and future debates?

YesNoNo Opinion

Your Comments (No URLs Allowed):

If you'd like a reply to your comments, provide your email:
(optional)

View other pubs in the following categories:

Era of Persistent Conflict
Landpower Employment & Sustainment
Global Strategy